• Landry Clarke: The problem is that they keep comparing you to Jason Street. That's like comparing my music to the Red Hot Chili Peppers. I'm not the Red Hot Chili Peppers. I mean, I'm my own thing. I'm not any better or any worse. It's just different.
  • Matt Saracen: You're definitely a whole lot worse.
  • 1 month ago
  • 32 notes

Yesterday morning I was thinking about the Boston Marathon, as just about every runner was. I was thinking about the Back Bay, where I lived for three years post-college. I was thinking about my tiny apartment, and how my Marathon Days (Patriots’ Day, technically, but everyone I knew called it Marathon Day) was a day off work, a day to sleep in, a day to stagger out midday and gape at the marathoners, who ran right past my apartment and seemed like another species.

I was over a decade younger then- thirty pounds heavier, rootless and restless and drinking too much. The idea of running a mile, much less 26.2, hadn’t entered my mind, although as the day went on and you would see the runners wrapped in Mylar walking the streets there was a pang of-something.

Yesterday morning I was wondering if I’d ever return to Boston- I haven’t been back since I left in 2001 and I often wonder if that city and neighborhood I love is too entwined with the person I was then (not a very happy person, let’s just say) to make a return. But I always thought if I did return what better way to do it than to run Boston. Early yesterday morning I thought, well, that would take more training than I think I am even capable of. But, you know, if I did it, what a way to close that chapter, what a moment of redemption.

Of course, that was early yesterday morning. 

It’s ridiculous to think that just because I’ve run a few marathons I have any more claim on this race than anyone else. Just because I lived in the Back Bay I’m hurting any more or have any right to write about it than those who are there.  Seeing blood on sidewalks you walked every day is painful. Seeing runners have their most joyous moment of triumph taken from them is horrible. But it’s not the same heartache as that felt by those who walk those streets today and it’s not the same horror felt by those who were there. 

We’re not all Bostonians- it was my home, it’s not my home, yet it will always be a part of my home. My love to everyone there and to the Boston Marathon. 

  • 1 month ago
  • 0 notes

I saw *a* boob….

I had pretty low expectations for Seth MacFarlane- ok, I predicted he would be worse than Franco-Hathaway- but I have to admit that in terms of fulfilling the role of Oscar host- standing up and keeping the show moving- he was competent. In terms of the content of his delivery, though, he was banal. What has puzzled me the most about the during-and-post-show commentary were the descriptions of his humor as “edgy.” 

This is 2013, y’all. Jokes about Jews controlling Hollywood, “oh my god you might think I am gay! Tee hee,” older actors dating younger women and actresses starving themselves are not cutting edge. I was reminded of nothing so much as when my son Nathan discovered the word “butt” at age 3, and stood in the living room, shaking his rear and singing “butt butt butt butt butt” over and over. It was that level of envelope-pushing. (Except to be honest Nathan was much funnier.)

However, just because anti-Semitism, homophobia and misogyny are nothing new doesn’t mean they’re okay, either, and that was what left such a bad taste in my mouth. “We Saw Your Boobs?” Really? These women are here because they are being honored for their work- years and years of incredibly hard work and amazing performances, and we’re going to reduce them to boobs? 

I thought of 9 year old Quvenzhane Wallis then, and wondered if she noticed. If she noticed that even if someday she plays a character who is being raped, for pete’s sake, some idiot is taking note of the exact time stamp because, hey, boobs. If she noticed that even if someday she is as accomplished as Meryl Streep, the Academy may still think reducing her to “boooooobs” is an appropriate accolade. 

How could she not notice? MacFarlane made sure to point out exactly how long was left until she would begin to be boob-tracking-worthy…. and reminded us all that time would be fleeting. Sally Field, you may be nominated for a third Academy Award, but let’s not forget that the time when your boobs were of interest has long passed.

My main gig is raising two boys, so I always come back to what I want them to learn- and not learn- from moments like this. They both have girls they know and admire- S. is the best reader in kindergarten, C. does first grade math, the other S. tells the funniest jokes. In preschool H. loves bugs and reptiles, C. swings higher than even the 4 year olds. I wonder when and if their peers will stop judging these girls on their merits- when my sons will find themselves confronted with the choice to objectify them. How do I help them remember women are just as human as they are? How do I show them how wrong so much of our culture is?

I don’t know the answers, but I do hope that by the time they hit adolescence, Seth MacFarlane will have outgrown his. I’m not holding my breath, though- his unimaginative riffs on 3 year old “butt butt butt” humor have made him a lot of money. He’ll keep going with “boobs boobs boobs” until the market for that dries up. It’s a long road ahead.

____

(The two things I *do* hope Quvenzhane noticed were:

1)Of the six young filmmakers chosen to carry the trophies, three were women and two were women of color. 

2) Shatner’s joke about Amy and Tina- in a very short time we’ve gone from a time where you could get paid to argue that women aren’t funny to a time when the conventional wisdom is that the funniest, best hosts would have been two women.

We’ve come a long way, Quvenzhane. But some of the men are having a hard time keeping up.)

  • 2 months ago
  • 6 notes
Procrastinating after reading the NYT. 

Procrastinating after reading the NYT

  • 3 months ago
  • 0 notes
It may be presumptuous to say you know more than @benandjerrys about creating and naming pop culturally themed ice cream. But I think Night Cheesecake (dark chocolate with cheesecake and caramel) speaks for itself. 

It may be presumptuous to say you know more than @benandjerrys about creating and naming pop culturally themed ice cream. But I think Night Cheesecake (dark chocolate with cheesecake and caramel) speaks for itself. 

  • 3 months ago
  • 1 note
I always thought 1 small apple=serving. Despite their “more matters” label, McDonald’s disagrees? #oppositeofsupersize

I always thought 1 small apple=serving. Despite their “more matters” label, McDonald’s disagrees? #oppositeofsupersize

  • 3 months ago
  • 0 notes
ourpresidents:

The Nixon family with their dogs Vicky, Pasha, and King Timahoe around the Christmas tree in the White House residence. 
L-R, President Richard Nixon, Pat Nixon, Julie Eisenhower, David Eisenhower, Tricia Nixon Cox, and Ed Cox.

Notable because this is around the time Julie started to become more chic than Tricia. (I’d wear Julie’s dress TODAY.)

ourpresidents:

The Nixon family with their dogs Vicky, Pasha, and King Timahoe around the Christmas tree in the White House residence. 

L-R, President Richard Nixon, Pat Nixon, Julie Eisenhower, David Eisenhower, Tricia Nixon Cox, and Ed Cox.

Notable because this is around the time Julie started to become more chic than Tricia. (I’d wear Julie’s dress TODAY.)

(via emilyelisabeth-deactivated20130)

  • 5 months ago
  • 131 notes

Powerless Over People, Places And The Things They Post On Facebook

In the past few days, like most of us, I’ve been full of fear and anxiety and anger. I haven’t handled it well- especially the first day, when I channeled my feelings into picking fights with my brother on Facebook, hiding and unhiding him, returning again and again to state things with the subtext shut up, you idiot.

It didn’t help. It made me feel worse, and worse as the Facebook comments piled up- on my page, on friends’ posts, all over- and I realized people I know and love are having very different reactions to the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary. I can’t wrap my head around it- I try to be tolerant and open to all, but the idea that children’s lives are the price we pay to live in a “free” society makes no sense to me. That’s not the kind of freedom I want- if we’re going to regulate what people can do in a crowded theater we shouldn’t just keep them from shouting fire, we should make the rest of feel reasonably confident no one will open fire.

(But I digress— see, I am doing it again. And why? Social media is one arena where we can all write so much and yet none of the words are heard. I know I am guilty of it, why do I think someone who disagrees with me will even read this, much less give the idea that maybe we should regulate firearms any more thought than I give the argument that “murderers will always find ways to kill so why bother regulating firearms” any credence? What I wanted to shout there was, “YOU’RE RIGHT, LET’S LET EVERYONE HAVE NUKES BECAUSE THEY DON’T KILL PEOPLE! People kill people! And also does that bumper sticker sentiment take into account deaths from accidental discharge because I think in that instance guns kind of do kill people?” But to what avail?)

It got distracting, for me. All I could see were the ways in which dear people were so wrong and there were so many of them and how could I ever speak to some of them again the same way, knowing how we differed on the firearms vs. human lives valuation scale?

I did the only thing I know how to do- I asked for help. My friend M. told me that I had to step back, and trust that God was bigger than the disagreements I saw. God is bigger than any argument on Facebook, Twitter, or anywhere else. “God is bigger than crazy,” she said. (And by crazy I do not mean mentally ill, I mean crazy like thinking the way to make our children safer is to give every school teacher a gun. God is probably bigger than both.)  

Of course, if God is more powerful than my anger and irritation then God probably ought to be big enough to prevent a massacre like this in the first place. Yet that was much less of a theological stumbling block for me. Several times a week I hear stories of God’s work and am told that God is doing for us what we could not do for ourselves. But I don’t think God always does what we can do for ourselves, and in this case I do believe we could have protected those children. 16 times so far this year, 88 people dead, but I think the power to prevent it was in our hands.

What I cannot do for myself- maybe you can- is balance my outrage, my need to take action, and my fear with my interactions on social media this past week. I’m stepping away from the topic after this online- I will continue to write my representatives, and our Christmas Jar money will be going to the Brady Campaign. But I’m not going to return to talking about it online until I figure out how to listen and talk, not just shout and berate. I don’t know how to do that- the topic is so raw for me and I am truly set in my opinions- but I have seen God do so much more, and I have to have faith that on this, like any other larger issue, my own part is very small. I don’t know what I’m supposed to do in all this- I feel compelled to act, act, act until everyone’s mind is changed, but I don’t think that’s God’s plan. 

I know God can do so many things that we cannot do for ourselves, and I know right now people are turning to God as they understand Him to heal so many larger things than my inability to Play Nice On The Internet. I need to remind myself God is big enough to handle it. I’m not.

  • 5 months ago
  • 0 notes
"It was obviously an unfortunate incident. It kind of made me sad on two accounts. One was that I was very sad that we live in an age when someone takes a picture of another person in a vulnerable moment and rather than delete it, and do the decent thing, sells it. And I’m sorry that we live in a culture that commodifies sexuality of unwilling participants, which takes us back to ‘Les Mis,’ because that’s what my character is."

This is what happens when you ask Anne Hathaway about that time she accidentally showed her Princess Diary to a bunch of photographers. (via entertainmentweekly)

This was some tenth-degree black belt media judo here. Read the setup:

Matt Lauer doesn’t mess around. When he greeted Anne Hathaway on the Today show this morning, the host got right down to business: “Good to see you,” he said. “Seen a lot of you lately.”

Lauer, of course, was referring to Hathaway’s major wardrobe malfunction at Monday’s Les Mis premiere. While exiting her car in a tight Tom Ford gown, the Oscar nominee accidentally flashed a crowd of photographers — who quickly noticed that Hathaway wasn’t wearing underwear.

She didn’t get defensive, she didn’t get flustered, and she brought the conversation back to her primary reason for being on the show in the first place. Damn.

(via kenyatta)

I did not have strong opinions about Anne Hathaway until just now. Obviously, she is fantastic.

(via soniasaraiya)

  • 5 months ago
  • 12,187 notes

About

Stuff that's more than 140 characters, I guess.

Latest Tweets

    See more...